Cahier Charcot -> Lisbon Declaration
 
 
EUROPEAN CHARCOT FOUNDATION
 
LISBON DECLARATION
 
European Charcot Foundation Symposium
"Treatment Strategies in Multiple Sclerosis. From pathophysiology to clinical practice"
17 - 19 November 2005
 
 
Results from a Round Table Discussion on Rules for individual patient care in MS.
J. Palace (chair), M. Amato, G. Comi, G. Edan
M. Friedrichs, O.R. Hommes
 
Introduction
  • All MS patients should receive the best available treatment, independent of country
  • Education of patients and physicians on MS should continue, supported by Health Care Systems and Pharmaceutical Industry
  • Clinical tools to monitor patients should improve
  • Post marketing, observational long term studies should investigate efficiency and compliance of treatment
  • Full patient information is a prerequisite
  • Patient's and doctor's freedom of choice concerning treatment should be preserved
Individual Patient Care
  • MS Health Care should shift its attention from disease orientation to care orientation
  • Quality of care should have monitoring tools
  • MS doctors should learn from daily practice
  • Learning relies on reliable information
  • Amount of structured information should increase through network of treating doctors, served by information technology (Blumhardt et al. 2000)
  • Improve clinical measurement tools
  • Improve MRI skills of MS doctors
  
Diagnosis
  • Careful exclusion of other diseases by CSF, immunology, neurophysiology
  • Make diagnosis as early as possible
  • Assess patient's condition
    • use EDSS - Kurtzke FS - timed walked (TW)
    • use Blumhardt Eight (BE)
    • use Gad+ MRI
  • Categorize individual patient's prognosis for progression
    • use prognostic markers (Confavreux 2003)
    • use educated guess risk assessment (Blumhardt 2000)
  • Categorize individual patient's treatment response
    • use prognostic markers
    • use educated guess treatment response (Blumhardt 2000)
Disease modifying treatment
  • shared decision making by patient and doctor (Heesen 2004)
  • define response to treatment (relapse reduction)
  • define treatment failure (EJN 2004)
Management
  • check at 3-6 months interval
  • use monitoring tools EDSS - FS - TW - BE
  • use Gad+ MRI
Results of Treatment
  • Disability: use clinical tools - EDSS - Kurtzke FS - TW
  • Blumhardt eight (BE)
      • spasticity
      • pain
      • depression
      • bladder function
     
      • ataxia
      • cognitive decline
      • fatigue
      • sexual activity
  • Adverse events, serious adverse events
  • Compliance
Literature
  • Blumhardt et al.: A quality network model for the daily care of multiple sclerosis
    Multiple Sclerosis (2000) 6, 231 - 236
  • Confavreux et al: Early clinical predictors and progression of irreversible disability in multiple sclerosis: an amnesic process
    Brain (2003) 126, 770-782
  • International Working Group for Treatment Optimization in MS: Treatment optimization in multiple sclerosis: report of an international consensus meeting
    EJN (2004) 11:43-47
  • Heesen et al.: Decisional role preferences, risk knowledge and information interest in patients with multiple sclerosis
    Multiple Sclerosis (2004) 10:1-8
 
Glossary
  • BE:      Blumhardt Eight
  • EDSS:  Expanded Disability Status 
               Scale
  • FS:      Functional Systems
  • Gad:    Gadolinium
  • MS:     Multiple Sclerosis
  • TW:     Timed Walked   


   Print this page   Tell-a-friend